DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY EVIDENCE

UK Global Talent Visa digital technology evidence guide

A practical explanation of the application pack, how the mandatory and optional criteria fit together, and what makes evidence persuasive rather than merely descriptive.

Guidance checked against GOV.UK on 1 September 2026. Always confirm the current rules before submitting.

The document requirements at a glance

3 pagesMaximum length of the CV
3 lettersFrom three different established experts
10 documentsMaximum criterion evidence pack
3 pages eachMaximum length of each evidence document

The criterion evidence must include at least two documents showing recognition as a leading or potential talent. It must also include at least four documents across two optional criteria, using two documents for each selected optional criterion. The same evidence document cannot be used for more than one criterion.

How MC and OC1 to OC4 work

MC

Recognition

Evidence that other people in digital technology recognise you as a leader or potential leader within the last five years.

OC1

Innovation

A track record of innovation as a founder, senior executive or employee working on a new digital field or concept.

OC2

Work beyond your occupation

Recognition for activity outside your normal employment that contributes to advancing the digital technology field.

OC3

Significant contribution

Significant technical, commercial or entrepreneurial contribution within a product-led digital technology company.

OC4

Academic contribution

Exceptional ability demonstrated through research that has been published or endorsed by an expert.

What strong evidence normally proves

Your individual contribution: what you personally decided, designed, built, led or changed.

Measurable impact: adoption, revenue, users, efficiency, growth, reach or another result with a clear baseline.

Independent corroboration: credible third-party or employer evidence confirming the claim and your role.

Criterion relevance: a direct connection between the achievement and the exact criterion being claimed.

Recent recognition: evidence that supports the required recognition within the last five years.

Common evidence weaknesses

Job descriptions, screenshots and self-authored narratives can explain context, but they rarely prove impact alone. Strong packs separate responsibility from result, avoid counting team achievements as personal achievements, support important numbers, and remove contradictions across the CV, personal statement, letters and evidence.

Applicants should also avoid using one document for multiple criteria, exceeding page limits, relying heavily on evidence outside the relevant period, or filling all ten slots with weaker material simply because space is available.

REVIEW YOUR OWN PACK

Turn the guidance into a document-by-document action plan.

Upload your CV, recommendation letters and evidence for a private review against your chosen Talent or Promise pathway.

Start for £15